Screenwriting Cross Training: Picking up Additional Skills of Filmmaking by Animating, Directing, and Editing a Written Scene, Social Media Gurus, Jean-Luc Godard Sleeping with Charlie Kaufman, and a Hopeful Future for Storytellers

Posted by – January 20, 2010

I’ve found a way for a screenwriter to quickly and painlessly animate a simple scene…

When running in old circles a month ago, I came across this comic computer-animated video from Markham Nolan showing the very delicate soft sell technique of a true social media professional.

How NOT to be a Social Media Guru

At the end is an ad for the technology that was used to create the animation.

I looked into it.

The text-to-movie technology from Xtranormal is billed as so easy if you can type, you can make movies, and it took two seconds before I decided to animate a scene from one of my screenplays.

I picked a scene; it’s one of my firsts but a favorite… so keep reading.

Animating it turned out to be really beneficial, it increased my understanding of what others are doing when they interpret my writing, and in the process I learned something about the language of editing.

It’s always best to be able to explain your vision in terms that other people in the production chain understand.

For a screenwriter who is still trying to increase their power to visualize a scene, I can see how animating something that they’ve written could really help.

With almost no effort this software allows you to create a computer-generated set with computer-generated actors to talk out simple scenes.

The online version of the software (which I recommend for its simplicity) is a little limited, as is real life, and even that’s a great lesson as there will always be a space between a script and its fruition.

In the last year, I’ve tried to learn a little about some of the peripheral arts around screenwriting. I’ve read books on acting, directing, editing, etc. and amazingly it all came into play even at this simplistic level.

Concepts like looking for emotion on a character’s face (or lack of it), knowing that some lines should be given while some should be received, and different ideas about editing for continuity when arranging shots were really brought home for me during this little exercise.

And remember the lesson was free.

One of the biggest filmmaking ideas I came to understand was the director’s concept of “coverage,” basically getting enough footage for editing; something as simple as three takes, three different ways, from three different angles.

This is the magical time when you find out everything your film will NOT be.

As great and as perfect as you think your story might be in screenplay form, it must take on substance sometime.

Godard is quoted as saying “editing is the transformation of chance into destiny.”

The online version of the software only allows for a limited number of camera angles, it’s about ten but that’s more coverage than you could probably expect in the real world.

This allows for the aspiring filmmaker to experiment.  After getting close-ups, shots from the waist up, over the shoulder shots, even some Dutch angles, it’s possible to change the script, and instantly have perfect reshoots from all angles.

Animating a scene from a project with this software is a fast and inexpensive way of developing or finding a style.

Many years ago I saw La Passion de Jeanne d’Arc, a film by Carl Theodor Dreyer from way back in 1928. I recommend it to all. As the title suggests the film is extremely emotional, a lot of tight close-ups of people crying.

Someone in the DVD extras explains that this is ironic because Dreyer went to great expense to build elaborate sets, only to draw the focus away with tight close-ups.

I thought well… why not save a few bucks on the set and just shoot close ups?

The establishing shot is the answer.

Most people with even a passing interest in film have heard these terms, but until you actually edit a film, it’s difficult to understand the power that they hold.

The audience feels uncomfortable not knowing where they are, even if the action is engaging.

It’s true on the screen; it’s true on the page.

Back to my little scene, arranged as a short film now: it’s about the role of third parties in the sexual fantasy life of couples.

I was going for a 50 year old La Nouvelle Vague, over saturated, deep focus, sort of a Jean-Luc Godard meets Charlie Kaufman but animated in 1 minute and 52 seconds affair.

I give you Sleeping with Charlie Kaufman.

Kaufman’s still a hero of mine. I hope he doesn’t object to the title.

He directed his latest effort, Synecdoche, New York. I highly recommend it, but fair warning, it will show you what you might be afraid to see and you might have a bad couple of days.

The last thing I would like to leave you with is something else I’ve realized while undertaking this little project… most people can’t tell a story with video.

I feel completely confident in that.

Xtranormal has a showcase for videos made with their technology. I’ve watched all of the “featured,” “most recent,” “most viewed,” “most discussed,” and “top rated” videos. Their technology is easy to use, and yet all of the videos are terrible.

There is a world of difference between using video to dramatically tell a story and Internet video at large.

Storytellers take heart; cheapening technology won’t cheapen storytelling.

May 2010 bring you happiness…

- J Roland Kelly

  • Share/Bookmark

New Year’s Prediction: Osama Bin Laden Will Be Found In 2010 – Conspiracy Theory Post #2

Posted by – January 1, 2010

It’s time for me to make a far-fetched prediction for the New Year again. Why? …because blogging isn’t a crime! I plan on making this a holiday tradition. Check out last year’s prediction.

Here we go. Osama Bin Laden will be found to have escaped Afghanistan, not to Pakistan but to Iran. He may or may not still be there. He could be in Yemen or any of his old stomping grounds including Sudan & Somalia.

His family is still in Iran now.

Osama Bin Laden hasn’t been captured because he’s been given refuge by Iran; it’ll be a big mess in 2010. Happy New Year, apocalyptic nostradamer conspiracy theorists!

  • Share/Bookmark

Screenwriting & Filmmaking: My Celebrity Cause; Ralph Baker & Larry Norman; Brian Lilly, Dzenan Ahmetovic, Sean Coutts, Mark Spencer, and Other Phoenix Police Officers Going to Prison; Ending Police Brutality, the Piggy and a Plea for Help

Posted by – October 11, 2009

Some things make me so angry I can’t think straight. Police brutality and corruption is one.

Today I saw in the news the story of Tony Arambula.

Watch this from CNN first.

I recommend clicking-on-through to YouTube and reading the full description on the side.

This incident is now making national news because a 911 tape has been released, which picked up the cops immediately plotting a cover-up, and it exposes the lies that the Phoenix Police Department told after the fact.

The area of the United States I grew up in is notorious for police corruption, I am very sensitive to this, and when I see news about police brutality, it lingers with me.

If I’m ever on a celebrity game show, there’s no question as to what cause I’ll be raising money.

I’ve officially decided trying to stop police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is now my bag. I’ve been considering “my bag” for awhile.

After seeing the video of the UCLA student tasered by University police in the Powell Library, a couple of years ago (see how the case was resolved), I started thinking, and looking for macro solutions.

The best my mental processer cycles can devise is a website. It would work like this…

First, it would link to news stories about police misconduct, to try to expose, and raise awareness of the problem- of course.

It would provide information about how to file a complaint, if someone felt that they were wronged, and explain your legal protections to do so.

These are givens; here’s what would really make it work…

The bad cop award.

A visitor to the site could tell their story and nominate a police officer for a misconduct in the line of duty award. To sensationalize the award and make it memorable, the award would be known as a “piggy.”

The visitor nominating a police officer for this award could attach their name or remain anonymous.

The technical IT part of the bad cop award, would more or less work like this… the visitor fills out a form, the information generates a webpage using a html template search engine optimized for the name of the offending officer and the police department. A cron job runs a site index generator through the new pages to make sure they get indexed in the major search engines as fast as possible.

This SEOed-out name optimized webpage IS the award.

When someone Googles or Bings the police officer’s name or the name of the department, the award presents itself.

This site would go one step farther; it would offer the visitor a printable certificate copy of the award including the address of the police department to which the visitor could physically mail the certificate of shame, letting that officer know that he or she will forever be linked on the Internet to misconduct.

The site maybe able to get the addresses of police departments around the country by searching Google Maps for “police” and the zip code, Google gives the addresses if it’s possible to strip everything else.

Anyway, imagine a corrupt rural sheriff (Ralph Baker, soon to be a movie) or this urban Phoenix police officer Brian Lilly getting thousands of letters (piggy awards) sent to their department praising them for a bad job.

Imagine the awkwardness of a cop receiving just one.

I’m sorry, but the Greek chorus has spoken… here’s your piggy!

Big city, little town, rural, it doesn’t matter- no police misconduct would be immune. From a traffic ticket given for out of State plates, to the verbal threats, and escalation that cops use during routine procedures, the general public would finally have an outlet.

Statistics about police misconduct from the website could be gathered, problems in the nation isolated.

If a cop wanted to sue, good luck with that, social media is a beast, and so is the ACLU.

Something like this could work, I see people doing this in unorganized forms already. It’s not wise to trust cops to police cops, giving them exclusivity over the criminal domain.

Terrence Duren, the UCLA cop (that DICKLESS piece of sh!t is STILL a university cop!) the one that tasered the kid in the library was found not to have violated any polices by an internal investigation, an independent investigation found the complete opposite and UCLA recently settled with the victim.

Brian Lilly, the Phoenix cop in the above story that shot the homeowner first in the back, three more times, and then twice when he was on the ground, was cleared of wrongdoing by a Phoenix police board, and now that the 911 tape came out, that police board and every individual on it is a laughingstock.

It’s a good thing those laughingstocks and most other police commissions, boards, internal reviews, etc. are confidential.

Brian Lilly maybe a shooter of an innocent family man in the back, but the other police officers (Sgt. Sean Coutts, etc.) agreed to go along for the ride. They tried to isolate the wounded man until he died, to cover up their tracks, but he didn’t die. I wonder if anyone has applied any RICO type/ racketeering laws to a thoroughly corrupt police force. IANAL.

Officer Mark Spencer, president of the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association, rallied around the police officers claiming that Tony Arambula wasn’t shot in the back. Medical experts now say otherwise, the 911 tapes now prove otherwise, Mark Spencer is a fool, and a disgrace to the profession. As far as I’m concerned, he’s is now apart of the cover-up.

I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore.

Using the Internet to shame cops into behaving may not be the best way to expose and stop police brutality, corruption, and misconduct, but none-the-less I’m officially putting my back into this police corruption business.

If there’s a better way, I’m listening, until then…

If you are a PHP guy who knows how to have a good time (anonymously, if you must), or you are Tony Arambula and want to donate some of what will be your six million dollar settlement to prevent future abuse by police (and like social experiments), shoot me an email.

I’ll try to show you a good time.

I’ve organized LLCs, & have marketing and SEO experience. I’ll donate time. I’ll donate an aged domain: www.stop-police-brutality.com. I’ve written several screenplays, if I have to write, I’ll write. If I have to fold envelopes, I’ll fold envelopes. Sweep floors, sweep floors.

I’m ready to get out of my comfort zone on this. I’m not absolutely certain how to proceed, but my mind and heart is now in it.

Ralph Baker, Larry Norman, Brian Lilly, Dzenan Ahmetovic, Sean Coutts, Mark Spencer, and Terrence Duren, I’m sorry, but the Greek chorus has spoken… here’s your piggy!

- J Roland Kelly

  • Share/Bookmark

Screenwriting, Storytelling, & Greek Mythology: Read, Recycle, Rape, Repeat & Jesus

Posted by – September 3, 2009

173591_f260

It's good to be the Zeus.

There’s this series on the History Channel, called Clash of the Gods, I watch it, it’s quite fair. You can view some of it online here. The DVDs of season 1 go to Netflix in January.

I’ve watched every episode so far, and it’s renewed my interest in Greek mythology.

In the past, I’ve tried to gain some working knowledge of the myths, only to find the two common approaches to understanding these stories lacking.

You can one, just passively accept the drivel naturally in your own culture about the myths, it’s mostly from children’s storytellers, and you will end up with a version of the myth that is almost completely rewritten to draw attention away from the dirty parts… and it’s mostly dirty parts, as these stories are meant for adults.

Or you can take an academic approach, and you will quickly find that the myths change from place to place and from time period to time period.

This approach kills these myths as a dramatic story, and it becomes hard to see the greatness that they are.

But there’s another way, and I started to understand by watching the show on the History Channel.

Clash of the Gods presents one Greek god per one-hour episode, complete with a retelling of the god’s story. If maybe a little superficial, it at least presents the gods in the arch of a story and …

The best way to see these gods is in flight.

What I’ve learned is that after generations of telling these stories the plot points (turns, twists, whatever) are sharp.

The stories are absolutely complete; the characters are three dimensional, and ironically even the gods are very human.

But in order to see the perfection of these myths, you have to hear it as a story.

And after a good retelling of one of these stories, you will NEVER forget it.

It’s absolutely not a burden to grasp an understanding of Greek mythology.

If you can’t remember it, then you didn’t hear a storyteller tell it.

Drunken, horny, un-bathed fisherman sailing under a Greek sky 2500 years ago perfected these stories, they’re not highbrow, and quite good. I would forget anything with footnotes at first.

Some really great stories…

Zeus, Hades, Hercules, all the stories are phenomenal. Here are a few beats…

Cronus (Saturn, Zeus’ dad) was told that one of his kids would overthrow him, and so imprisoned his own children. Zeus was hidden away as a child by his mother and not subject to his father’s imprisonment. When the kid became a young man he decides to overthrow his dad. Zeus first frees his siblings and uses their combined efforts to defeat the father.

Afterwards, Zeus takes his brothers (two, both older) aside and talks about how the universe is to be split up between them. By rite, the inheritance should be passed on to the older brother, but Zeus has created quite a powerful coalition of different characters to defeat the father and has grown strong, so he asks that the brothers draw lots instead.

Zeus gets the longer straw and claims the heavens, the middle brother gets the middle straw and claims the oceans and the seas, his name is Poseidon.

The oldest brother the one that should have gotten everything draws the short lot, and well… his name is Hades and he gets the underworld.

But my favorite myth so far is Hercules, a man who was cursed by the heavens from birth, never got an even break; he took everything the universe could throw at him, and died undefeated.

The story of Hercules is pure Hemingway. It contains on absent father, a women scorned, a cruel world, and an undefeated man. It has to be in the top ten greatest stories ever created by mankind.

Hercules was Jesus Christ before Jesus Christ was Jesus Christ.

In fact, investigate for your self to see if he really wasn’t. Remember the entire bible, and more specifically the New Testament did an oscillation in Greek before being pushed out into the rest of the world.

Strange things happened at that time.

I shouldn’t get into it but it’s fascinating, in a storytellers’ sense, Paul most likely created (or embellished, give me a break people) the story of Jesus when we was in Greece.

Hercules was the ideal Greek man at the time. Things come together. Look at the story of Hercules and draw your own conclusion.

“Jesus, bro, I want those people back, dude”

– Christopher Walken as Hades

I was surprised to find so much influence of the Greek gods in the Bible; many editions use the words Hades (both name of the Greek underworld and it’s ruling god) and Tartarus (a torturous place in Hades).

In newer editions, for example the King James these words are just changed to “hell.”

But Jesus doesn’t originally go to “hell” to let everyone out, he goes to Hades. It’s significant.

Imagine being Greek and a foreign “god” (Jesus) coming to YOUR underworld and taking everyone to HIS heaven.

And pointblank in the book of Revelation, Jesus is supposed to come back and throw Hades (the god) into the lake of fire. Rev. 20:14

In different ways and for different reasons, later bible thumpers had to change the god Hades to “hell” or “death” in their version of the book.

Johnny Cash Taunts Hades

One ironic line of translation concerning Hades is somewhere in Revelations 6:6, when two words the King James bible counsel people wanted to translate as “hell” show up in the same sentence.

So they translate one as hell, and translate one as death, when one was really hell and the other was Hades as a god.

Hades is very much apart of the New Testament.

The particular line in question (very dramatic) appears in The Man Comes Around, the first song on Johnny Cash’s last album. It’s in the very last line of the song and Cash follows the King James’ translation.

All of this is new to me, and I was like wow, what is Jesus doing in Greek mythology, or what is Greek mythology doing in the Bible?

I’ve never cared before, about versions, or translations, I am not a person of the book, myself, but I enjoy a good story.

Obscuring the Greek

When Christianity got to Greece two thousand years ago, the Greek myths started to die, they began to be told less and less. People apparently preferred Christianity.

As great as the Greek myth stories are, I think Christianity won out because it’s more interactive; with its judgment schema it’s more engaging.

I appreciate Buddhism for the same reason.

What I’ve learned here is the study of storytelling absolutely has a place in religious studies.

And so we’re clear… Johnny Cash is in Heaven.

In the beginning there was the Word and the Word was with God and God was the Word – John 1:1

I don’t like all versions of the Greek myths. There are no definitive versions. There are inscriptions on temples, and there are plays written by playwrights and sometimes poets, but the works are always adapted for each presentation.

Hercules is one of my favorites, but I have found some prominent versions of the tale I think are terrible, including the version Herakles by Euripides from c. 416 BCE.

Euripides plays around with the timeline of the traditional myth and it doesn’t work for me, it loses one of its greater plot points, but it’s good to see that these stories are flexible and no one got upset when someone else spun it a little differently.

The worst version of Hercules I’ve discovered has to be…

I would call this version Pedophiles’ Delight.

I would call this version Pedophiles’ Delight.

In the traditional myth, Hercules is the product of rape, and he cuts his wife and children to pieces.

That can’t be in a Disney movie, so it isn’t. The story Disney created is about a boy separated from a loving family.

It’s awful, but adults don’t object when kids see it, and when you think about it, it really is all about the kids.

The Greeks thought so.

I want to live long enough to see Disney do a version of Hamlet.

That Old Time Religion

I remember reading a book about novel writing in which the author addressed the use of “borrowing” ideas or technique.

He simply said, “Shakespeare stole, are you better than Shakespeare?” It’s a good thought.

I’ve found a lot of good stuff in Greek mythology that I’m picking up with the five finger discount. I would recommend it to anyone, apparently Paul of Tarsus thought so.

And if it was good enough for Paul…

-J Roland Kelly

  • Share/Bookmark

Screenwriting, Songwriting, & Ramen Profitable Artistic Endeavors: Doing Anything Artistic? This is the future…

Posted by – July 15, 2009

Ramen_Profitable

There was a term that became popular in the business start-up scene six months ago… “ramen profitable.”

I like this term. I know first hand what it means.

Basically a business enterprise might find itself in a situation where it does make a profit, but only large enough to supply its founders with rent and basic food money.

I’ve lived on ramen noodles… I’ve turned white rice into a frienemy, after one failed entrepreneurial episode in my life I didn’t eat rice for a year.

This term “ramen profitable” has more connected with it than profit, the concept being that after a business gets this stage, it gives the creators time to quit their day jobs and try to grow the project.

What it really means is that the business model is working, but just not well enough for others to swoon over.

This goes hand-in-hand with this other concept growing on the start-up scene, that it now takes NO money to start a business.

A computer, housing & bandwidth are all things the average person has anyway. You might need web hosting and the short-term services of a web programmer from someplace like rentacoder.com, but this will come out of your personal entertainment budget…

I promise you, after starting some kind of entrepreneurial endeavor, you start to think about it like entertainment, and your budget for Star Wars figurines will drop to zero.

You will be pulled out of the chorus of Stars Wars figurine-buying suckers for the rest of your life.

Welcome to adulthood.

Overall what this new concept about being able to start a business with $0, is that it is cheaper, faster, better, more successful, this, that, and the other thing, to just try a business and see if it works than to bring in business “professionals” to create business plans, find funding, and this, that, and the other thing.

Okay, why am I writing about this?

I predict that the artistic mediums move towards this model.

In Ecuador, I saw a local kid traveling with a beat up Macbook, and he had created this really impressive, intricately edited video about his travels using the free iMovie software that came with Mac.

I was really impressed. I knew that iMovie could do this I just didn’t know anyone who spent that much time with iMovie before just moving up to Final Cut Pro.

At the same time I saw a video “professional,” who with a package of equipment that a few years ago probably cost $20,000 create a simply shot, simply edited video that should never have been made.

The local kid with iMovie was more talented.

But the ability to edit video in the simple style of Oscar winning films is now just a give-me.

Cameras are coming down in price, there exists point & shoot still cameras with the ability to capture video in HD, even if it’s not “True HD,” one day it will be.

Maybe one-day camera phones with capture in HD, and then what will be everyone’s excuse for not making films?

Soon the world will be a place where people who want to make films, will just make films.

No grant writing for documentaries, no more screenplay readers reading for films.

Soon it will be cheaper just to shoot a film, than pay a screenwriting guru to review your script.

I can only compare this to inroads that music has already made towards the future.

At one time there were songwriters, who wrote for big stars, these songwriters had crude home studios to “demo” a song, if the songwriter wrote a good song, the star sang it in a studio and made everyone a million bucks.

Now, the songwriter writes the song, records it in his home studio, and it’s finished. No, demoing, no big star, the equipment in his house is as good as a studio.

The songwriter sings it and everyone knows it. The end.

If we don’t like it because the singer isn’t pretty enough, well it’s left up to us to deal with our own prejudices… but with this added burden we can also get more authentic music.

Go Jonas Brothers Go!

But even filmmaking, one of the most complex, expensive of the composite arts is becoming almost free to make.

And that means that soon there will be artists in this medium that can reach the orbit of “ramen” profitability.

One local guy, filling one local theater, for one showing, of one local film, in which no one asks for their money back, could float said guy on a diet of ramen noodles for one year or the time until the completion of his next film.

Even if you are not starving, having had rich parents, and went to film school, the cost of filmmaking coming down is a good thing.

It means that the artistic lifestyle is more sustainable, and the chance of having a second film after your first is more plausible.

Sorry for my blogging hiatus, I was writing for real.

-      J Roland Kelly

  • Share/Bookmark

© 2007-2010 J ROLAND KELLY All Rights Reserved