Tag: Songwriting

Screenwriting, Storytelling, & Greek Mythology: Read, Recycle, Rape, Repeat & Jesus

Posted by – September 3, 2009

173591_f260

It's good to be the Zeus.

There’s this series on the History Channel, called Clash of the Gods, I watch it, it’s quite fair. You can view some of it online here. The DVDs of season 1 go to Netflix in January.

I’ve watched every episode so far, and it’s renewed my interest in Greek mythology.

In the past, I’ve tried to gain some working knowledge of the myths, only to find the two common approaches to understanding these stories lacking.

You can one, just passively accept the drivel naturally in your own culture about the myths, it’s mostly from children’s storytellers, and you will end up with a version of the myth that is almost completely rewritten to draw attention away from the dirty parts… and it’s mostly dirty parts, as these stories are meant for adults.

Or you can take an academic approach, and you will quickly find that the myths change from place to place and from time period to time period.

This approach kills these myths as a dramatic story, and it becomes hard to see the greatness that they are.

But there’s another way, and I started to understand by watching the show on the History Channel.

Clash of the Gods presents one Greek god per one-hour episode, complete with a retelling of the god’s story. If maybe a little superficial, it at least presents the gods in the arch of a story and …

The best way to see these gods is in flight.

What I’ve learned is that after generations of telling these stories the plot points (turns, twists, whatever) are sharp.

The stories are absolutely complete; the characters are three dimensional, and ironically even the gods are very human.

But in order to see the perfection of these myths, you have to hear it as a story.

And after a good retelling of one of these stories, you will NEVER forget it.

It’s absolutely not a burden to grasp an understanding of Greek mythology.

If you can’t remember it, then you didn’t hear a storyteller tell it.

Drunken, horny, un-bathed fisherman sailing under a Greek sky 2500 years ago perfected these stories, they’re not highbrow, and quite good. I would forget anything with footnotes at first.

Some really great stories…

Zeus, Hades, Hercules, all the stories are phenomenal. Here are a few beats…

Cronus (Saturn, Zeus’ dad) was told that one of his kids would overthrow him, and so imprisoned his own children. Zeus was hidden away as a child by his mother and not subject to his father’s imprisonment. When the kid became a young man he decides to overthrow his dad. Zeus first frees his siblings and uses their combined efforts to defeat the father.

Afterwards, Zeus takes his brothers (two, both older) aside and talks about how the universe is to be split up between them. By rite, the inheritance should be passed on to the older brother, but Zeus has created quite a powerful coalition of different characters to defeat the father and has grown strong, so he asks that the brothers draw lots instead.

Zeus gets the longer straw and claims the heavens, the middle brother gets the middle straw and claims the oceans and the seas, his name is Poseidon.

The oldest brother the one that should have gotten everything draws the short lot, and well… his name is Hades and he gets the underworld.

But my favorite myth so far is Hercules, a man who was cursed by the heavens from birth, never got an even break; he took everything the universe could throw at him, and died undefeated.

The story of Hercules is pure Hemingway. It contains on absent father, a women scorned, a cruel world, and an undefeated man. It has to be in the top ten greatest stories ever created by mankind.

Hercules was Jesus Christ before Jesus Christ was Jesus Christ.

In fact, investigate for your self to see if he really wasn’t. Remember the entire bible, and more specifically the New Testament did an oscillation in Greek before being pushed out into the rest of the world.

Strange things happened at that time.

I shouldn’t get into it but it’s fascinating, in a storytellers’ sense, Paul most likely created (or embellished, give me a break people) the story of Jesus when we was in Greece.

Hercules was the ideal Greek man at the time. Things come together. Look at the story of Hercules and draw your own conclusion.

“Jesus, bro, I want those people back, dude”

– Christopher Walken as Hades

I was surprised to find so much influence of the Greek gods in the Bible; many editions use the words Hades (both name of the Greek underworld and it’s ruling god) and Tartarus (a torturous place in Hades).

In newer editions, for example the King James these words are just changed to “hell.”

But Jesus doesn’t originally go to “hell” to let everyone out, he goes to Hades. It’s significant.

Imagine being Greek and a foreign “god” (Jesus) coming to YOUR underworld and taking everyone to HIS heaven.

And pointblank in the book of Revelation, Jesus is supposed to come back and throw Hades (the god) into the lake of fire. Rev. 20:14

In different ways and for different reasons, later bible thumpers had to change the god Hades to “hell” or “death” in their version of the book.

Johnny Cash Taunts Hades

One ironic line of translation concerning Hades is somewhere in Revelations 6:6, when two words the King James bible counsel people wanted to translate as “hell” show up in the same sentence.

So they translate one as hell, and translate one as death, when one was really hell and the other was Hades as a god.

Hades is very much apart of the New Testament.

The particular line in question (very dramatic) appears in The Man Comes Around, the first song on Johnny Cash’s last album. It’s in the very last line of the song and Cash follows the King James’ translation.

All of this is new to me, and I was like wow, what is Jesus doing in Greek mythology, or what is Greek mythology doing in the Bible?

I’ve never cared before, about versions, or translations, I am not a person of the book, myself, but I enjoy a good story.

Obscuring the Greek

When Christianity got to Greece two thousand years ago, the Greek myths started to die, they began to be told less and less. People apparently preferred Christianity.

As great as the Greek myth stories are, I think Christianity won out because it’s more interactive; with its judgment schema it’s more engaging.

I appreciate Buddhism for the same reason.

What I’ve learned here is the study of storytelling absolutely has a place in religious studies.

And so we’re clear… Johnny Cash is in Heaven.

In the beginning there was the Word and the Word was with God and God was the Word – John 1:1

I don’t like all versions of the Greek myths. There are no definitive versions. There are inscriptions on temples, and there are plays written by playwrights and sometimes poets, but the works are always adapted for each presentation.

Hercules is one of my favorites, but I have found some prominent versions of the tale I think are terrible, including the version Herakles by Euripides from c. 416 BCE.

Euripides plays around with the timeline of the traditional myth and it doesn’t work for me, it loses one of its greater plot points, but it’s good to see that these stories are flexible and no one got upset when someone else spun it a little differently.

The worst version of Hercules I’ve discovered has to be…

I would call this version Pedophiles’ Delight.

I would call this version Pedophiles’ Delight.

In the traditional myth, Hercules is the product of rape, and he cuts his wife and children to pieces.

That can’t be in a Disney movie, so it isn’t. The story Disney created is about a boy separated from a loving family.

It’s awful, but adults don’t object when kids see it, and when you think about it, it really is all about the kids.

The Greeks thought so.

I want to live long enough to see Disney do a version of Hamlet.

That Old Time Religion

I remember reading a book about novel writing in which the author addressed the use of “borrowing” ideas or technique.

He simply said, “Shakespeare stole, are you better than Shakespeare?” It’s a good thought.

I’ve found a lot of good stuff in Greek mythology that I’m picking up with the five finger discount. I would recommend it to anyone, apparently Paul of Tarsus thought so.

And if it was good enough for Paul…

-J Roland Kelly

  • Share/Bookmark

Screenwriting, Songwriting, & Ramen Profitable Artistic Endeavors: Doing Anything Artistic? This is the future…

Posted by – July 15, 2009

Ramen_Profitable

There was a term that became popular in the business start-up scene six months ago… “ramen profitable.”

I like this term. I know first hand what it means.

Basically a business enterprise might find itself in a situation where it does make a profit, but only large enough to supply its founders with rent and basic food money.

I’ve lived on ramen noodles… I’ve turned white rice into a frienemy, after one failed entrepreneurial episode in my life I didn’t eat rice for a year.

This term “ramen profitable” has more connected with it than profit, the concept being that after a business gets this stage, it gives the creators time to quit their day jobs and try to grow the project.

What it really means is that the business model is working, but just not well enough for others to swoon over.

This goes hand-in-hand with this other concept growing on the start-up scene, that it now takes NO money to start a business.

A computer, housing & bandwidth are all things the average person has anyway. You might need web hosting and the short-term services of a web programmer from someplace like rentacoder.com, but this will come out of your personal entertainment budget…

I promise you, after starting some kind of entrepreneurial endeavor, you start to think about it like entertainment, and your budget for Star Wars figurines will drop to zero.

You will be pulled out of the chorus of Stars Wars figurine-buying suckers for the rest of your life.

Welcome to adulthood.

Overall what this new concept about being able to start a business with $0, is that it is cheaper, faster, better, more successful, this, that, and the other thing, to just try a business and see if it works than to bring in business “professionals” to create business plans, find funding, and this, that, and the other thing.

Okay, why am I writing about this?

I predict that the artistic mediums move towards this model.

In Ecuador, I saw a local kid traveling with a beat up Macbook, and he had created this really impressive, intricately edited video about his travels using the free iMovie software that came with Mac.

I was really impressed. I knew that iMovie could do this I just didn’t know anyone who spent that much time with iMovie before just moving up to Final Cut Pro.

At the same time I saw a video “professional,” who with a package of equipment that a few years ago probably cost $20,000 create a simply shot, simply edited video that should never have been made.

The local kid with iMovie was more talented.

But the ability to edit video in the simple style of Oscar winning films is now just a give-me.

Cameras are coming down in price, there exists point & shoot still cameras with the ability to capture video in HD, even if it’s not “True HD,” one day it will be.

Maybe one-day camera phones with capture in HD, and then what will be everyone’s excuse for not making films?

Soon the world will be a place where people who want to make films, will just make films.

No grant writing for documentaries, no more screenplay readers reading for films.

Soon it will be cheaper just to shoot a film, than pay a screenwriting guru to review your script.

I can only compare this to inroads that music has already made towards the future.

At one time there were songwriters, who wrote for big stars, these songwriters had crude home studios to “demo” a song, if the songwriter wrote a good song, the star sang it in a studio and made everyone a million bucks.

Now, the songwriter writes the song, records it in his home studio, and it’s finished. No, demoing, no big star, the equipment in his house is as good as a studio.

The songwriter sings it and everyone knows it. The end.

If we don’t like it because the singer isn’t pretty enough, well it’s left up to us to deal with our own prejudices… but with this added burden we can also get more authentic music.

Go Jonas Brothers Go!

But even filmmaking, one of the most complex, expensive of the composite arts is becoming almost free to make.

And that means that soon there will be artists in this medium that can reach the orbit of “ramen” profitability.

One local guy, filling one local theater, for one showing, of one local film, in which no one asks for their money back, could float said guy on a diet of ramen noodles for one year or the time until the completion of his next film.

Even if you are not starving, having had rich parents, and went to film school, the cost of filmmaking coming down is a good thing.

It means that the artistic lifestyle is more sustainable, and the chance of having a second film after your first is more plausible.

Sorry for my blogging hiatus, I was writing for real.

-      J Roland Kelly

  • Share/Bookmark

Songwriting & Indie Music: J Roland Kelly Marshals Against Karl Rove is released

Posted by – January 20, 2009

Today is the last possible day (and the safest) to release a political charged song about the Bush administration, while still technically under the Bush administration.

So, I give you… J Roland Kelly Marshals Against Karl Rove.

I’m not sure who would argue that there’s been any good political music about the chaos of the last eight years, so I thought I would try my hand.

And over the last few months, I’ve written a number of blog posts about the new use of Audio to MIDI in independent music, and I was anxious for a chance to apply what I learned.

This is my first song released as a single, and I’ve been curious to experiment with the single format.

Anyway, enjoy, and good luck to the United States and the new President.

- J Roland Kelly

P.S. You can buy J Roland Kelly Marshals Against Karl Rove here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Songwriting & Sound Engineering: An update to last weeks post about MIDI ruling indie music and another suggestion for sound recording software creators

Posted by – November 8, 2008

UPDATE: Sound Engineering & Making Music: Converting Audio to MIDI In Your Digital Audio Workstation (DAW) to Perfectly Intertwine Organic and Virtual Instruments Plus a Lesson on Audio Plug-ins

After last weeks post about the new power of MIDI, I had another idea about how to incorporate my idea and hurry the future along…

The new power of MIDI rotates around the development of audio to MIDI conversion software, and I wrote last week that we would have to wait until a sound recording software maker like Apple or Adobe add this feature to their software packages like GarageBand, Adobe Audition, Logic, etc. in order for the full power of this to be seen, but it doesn’t have to be that way if some third party would create a new type of MIDI interface.

Let me explain.

A type of third party plug-in could be created that would work with every recording suite. It would work like this:

1. A microphone would record audio and convert it to MIDI in real time (this part is already done and you can download programs for free already).

2. Than a program (the program in question; not yet created) would take the MIDI newly being recorded from the audio and reconstitute it as the MIDI cable and USB pluses of a real MIDI interface such as a keyboard, thereby mimicking just another MIDI controller (again, all in real time).

The result would be that every sound recording program would just accept this as another MIDI input device and… Ta-Da the future!

More detailed advice to computer programmers:

1. Take one of the audio to MIDI conversion programs already created (lease it, buy it, or hack it at first, I suspect these are a dime a dozen and never make money) and look at the MIDI file that it creates as it converts audio to MIDI in real time. The MIDI file can’t be any different than a database.

2. Read up on USB and MIDI protocol to learn to generate MIDI signals from the file being created by the Audio to MIDI software.

3. Market the whole thing to cool young indie musicians, and feel cool and young… and rich and a music pioneer.

I just can’t get over what a good idea this is. Imagine laying down the guitar track, then you want the melody layered on top by an oboe but you don’t have an oboe or know an oboe player so you just play the melody on guitar and it gets converted to an oboe instantly… or forget the guitar for melody, you just hum it into the microphone.

I am currently reading a book on songwriting, and it mentions a few unorthodox songwriting methods; apparently Mel Brooks (who can’t play a single goddamn instrument) wrote the score for his Tony award winning Broadway show The Producers HIMSELF by humming into a tape recorder, and well paid musicians then took it from there.

And that’s the future I dream of… I want to be able to score an entire Broadway show (Tony winning) without knowing how to play a single instrument.

Of course Mel Brooks could have used the software that I propose, and his humming would have been turned instantly into a grand piano or a string section or what have you- for demo purposes.

- J Roland Kelly

Thank God.

  • Share/Bookmark

Sound Engineering & Recording Indie Music: The future of popular music – MIDI will rule and heads will roll – also MIDI keyboard players need to finally get a clue and your guitar is already a MIDI guitar

Posted by – November 1, 2008

UPDATE: Sound Engineering & Making Music: Converting Audio to MIDI In Your Digital Audio Workstation (DAW) to Perfectly Intertwine Organic and Virtual Instruments Plus a Lesson on Audio Plug-ins

I’m here in Quito, I’ve got Tom Waits on the ol’ Ipod, and it’s raining real hard. I thought I should get this rant down before the rainbows come out and start taking lives.

THE PREMISE

Basically, for the first time I think I understand where modern indie music is going, and I want to place my bets. (Mostly) all analog instruments are finished, and I want to make a guess at how they are finally going to be phased out. I bet that a sound recording program will “recreate” organically recorded music in pure perfect computer-generated tone, somewhat in the form of the current concept of MIDI.

I got this idea in my head when recently, against my will, I was forced to learn a lot about MIDI. I was surprised to learn that MIDI was actually nothing at all like what I thought and only in the last two years has it been worth a damn.

That surprised me because MIDI is very old.

PROBLEMS OF NOW

MIDI belongs to the piano, and to classical music, but things changed, the piano became the synthesizer, the synthesizer became the MIDI keyboard, and now if you just say “MIDI controller” people will understand what you mean.

Many homes still have a piano in some form or another, either a child’s keyboard, or a high dollar MIDI controller, the important thing being that the piano is still a very popular instrument.

And in my experience everyone who thinks they can play the piano, also believes they are on top of this MIDI thing. Every single time this has proved untrue.

Problems arise when you meet a person who plays a MIDI keyboard and you try to record a song together. You will eventually figure out that they have no clue how to control their software.

This has always frustrated me.

One, because the software is such an important part of their instrument that it IS their instrument.

Two, because I always thought they wanted me to learn their software for them, like it’s ONLY a software issue, like it’s my problem, like I care how their keyboard software works, when I can’t even play the keyboard.

And three, we always ended up recording their keyboard live through analog. I felt a little bad about it, as I knew it stripped the power of MIDI out of their instrument, but I didn’t know what to do about it, nor did they.

What I learned in the last few weeks is that MIDI for most of its life has been really weak, and when I recorded a MIDI keyboard as if it were a synthesizer, unknowingly that was the best I do at the time.

Everyone spoke of MIDI as magical and I didn’t know any better so I believed them.

But what’s magical? You can record a musical line, then play it back with different instrumentation, and also edit the musical line itself.

THE LIMITATIONS OF MIDI

Here is what you couldn’t do until recently – kick out the jams, motherfu*ker. You couldn’t jam, you couldn’t interact with other live organic instruments, while recording live.

In order for MIDI to be incorporated into a modern recording with voice or a live instrument it had to be completely finished and locked down, then the organic components could be added on top of it. I’m sorry, but that’s not how modern contemporary music is created.

This is why MIDI has always been pushed away from the mainstream, and why the classical music crowd has always embraced it. It’s perfect for old dead perfectly notated music.

THE NEW EVOLUTION OF MIDI

Most people who have a MIDI controller don’t understand the new power that’s opening up to them.

Ok, what’s changed? The software, but it’s all software.

Three major software developments have changed the world of MIDI.

The first was that (cheap or free) virtual instruments became so perfect that no one could tell the difference between a real and a fake. That is, MIDI tells the computer to play this music with a grand piano and the grand piano is so life-like the only way to tell that it is most likely MIDI is that it is TOO WELL RECORDED.

The second was that multi-track recording programs (GarageBand, Adobe Audition, etc.) rethought the way MIDI should be incorporated into the recording process. Why not treat it like any other instrument, let it be recorded live with other live instruments?

I always thought this was the case, as it should have been, but it’s actually quite new.

Of the sound recording programs with which I’m familiar, the first one with this feature was GarageBand. Adobe Audition 3, which is still only a few months old, added this feature mainly just in response to GarageBand.

I know nothing about Pro Tools and hopefully never will, as I don’t like their dependence on hardware. I don´t know anything about Logic 8, but hear good things about it.

While it sounds like GarageBand might be an innovator, I can’t recommend it. I find a new reason to hate GarageBand every day, while at the same time I find new reasons to like Adobe Audition.

That’s how I finally stand on the GarageBand Vs. Adobe Audition debate.

The third development was that all of the amplifier modeling software and after effects (like software EQ, software hardlimiters, all the professional stuff, etc.) got better than their physical counterparts.

Now, even with endless money to spend, after music is in a computer there is no reason that it should leave for any reason. This means that organic sound and MIDI have finally come together in the same place at the professional level.

That’s it. This new software and it’s new potential for MIDI isn’t very old.

WHY MIDI WILL RULE MUSIC

Recently, I saw someone working on an electronic music album. I even wrote a song with them and in the process saw their music making routine, which was new to my style.

The problem came when, during our song-making attempt, I wrote the guitar part first. Now, what? The MIDI has to interact with an organic instrument.

The programs like GarageBand and Adobe Audition could have handled it, but this person was using high-end software from the MIDI tradition.

After two weeks, they figured it out. They used Ableton Live “rewired” with Reason 4. These are two expensive programs from different software companies made to work together in tandem.

Remember, software that allows for interaction of organic and MIDI instruments is relatively new. I thought it was a hack, but it worked.

And when I saw how well it worked, I started pondering my faith.

I play guitar, and I was very jealous of what they had. Imagine being able to record a performance in a perfectly pure way, then if you hit a wrong string, or just wanted to make a small change, it was only a mouse click away, and that edit would become as good as if you had played it that way.

Powerful stuff.

But this person was in the stages of “mastering” their album. In the processes of working on our song I saw the waveform of one of their MIDI tracks and it was perfect already! What was there to master?

Why would a computer spit out a track derived from computer-generated sounds in any form less than perfect? How could it be morally culpable to let the track hit the peaker? If you don’t mess with it, MIDI is perfection itself.

The last thing is that there are no microphones involved. You don’t know what a blessing that is. Microphones are usually the give away of a non-professional recording.

Every MIDI instrument is always a perfectly mic’ed instrument, that is quite priceless in a production value sense.

I’m still waiting for an omni-directional USB microphone with a frequency response of 20-20k Hz. Even if MXL or another company finally releases one, it will still only produce the same old uneven recordings that are the nature of analog (with unintended car noses in the background probably).

The perfection of a computer-generated tone will break a sound engineer’s heart.

That’s why I’m packing up the analog instrument tent and giving up.

THE WORLD DOES NOT END WITH THE MAYAN CALENDER IN 2012; IT ENDS WITH THE STOCK MARKET CRASH IN 2008

I look at it this way, when I was learning to play guitar 10 years ago, I thought I needed all kinds of musical equipment that I couldn’t afford. The one solace in later life is that it all proved unnecessary, if I had been able to buy it, I would have just been throwing my money away.

Case and point: guitar amplifiers. I always wondered why my $80 practice amp (in 1998) never sounded like any guitars I heard on the radio. I always thought it was that I didn’t spend enough; I didn’t know anything about sound engineering at the time.

Now, everything has come full circle, and I think it’s a joke. If you want to spend two grand on a high-end amplifier today, guess what, it is just a computer with a large speaker mimicking what it thinks high-end amplifiers sound like.

Let me explain it this way, guitar amplifier modeling software has gotten so good, that real amplifiers now use it to create the sound that the software was supposed to be mimicking. It’s great, it allows for presets and so on. The point? You can buy the two thousand dollar amp or you can plug your guitar into your home computer, and your computer will give you more options.

So, acoustic guitars made out of endangered trees, the fine details between an American versus a Mexican made Stratocaster, expensive cables, all of that proved pointless. Plug in your guitar, record it, add a little reverb, and now tell me how much the equipment cost?

Sorry to have to tell you this, but if you can’t entertain a group of people with a $99 student guitar, you won’t be any more entertaining with a $7000 pre-war martin. It takes a long time to learn that but it’s true.

THE APOCALYPSE (Organic Instruments are MIDI)

Organic instruments for final playback are dead. MIDI recreations of those instruments are so much better, and there can be only one.

I’m a guitar player, not a great one, but I enjoy it, and I realize that I am never going to learn to play the piano. That may sound sad, but I’ve had plenty of time to get over it.

I wanted to know how could I get in on this MIDI thing?

I’ve spent time on the Internet trying to figure this out. People have come up with a few different options—

I could buy a “MIDI Guitar.” Companies are out there that are selling guitars with no strings, only buttons along the fret board. These are not cheap, start around $1500, and I can’t see how they could possible play anything like a guitar. Not for me.

Then there are aftermarket add-ons, essentially unique pick-ups that you attach to your guitar that goes to a computer. The computer tries to read the notes you are playing and converts them to MIDI. This technology is a little more bit my style, it’s called tone-to-MIDI, but I can see through the logic. Mostly it is someone wanting to sell you the pick-up, because a guitar pick-up no matter how unique is just a type of microphone.

So, my next google search was simply “audio to MIDI” and I hit the jackpot.

Everything now is just software of course, and what I found were dozens of programs both freeware and not, that try to convert audio to MIDI. Some say they can do it in real time. I tried a few of them and found out that they worked with my guitar, but with errors.

As it turns out tone-to-MIDI technology is not that advanced, and a guitar is very demanding instrument for the software, it spits out notes faster than a piano, it is always slightly out of tune, much of the time there are six individual notes playing, good guitaring is about some really subtle movements, and the software just doesn’t record and sample fast enough. All of this is problematic.

100 MILLION DOLLAR ADVICE FOR ADOBE AND APPLE

Get that tone-to-MIDI software working right and incorporate it into the next releases of GarageBand and Audition.

It might take some work, I can see it being a little like voice recognition technology. The musician might have to teach the software how to listen to their instrument. The software might ask you to play some common chords for example. It could be processor intensive and unrealistic in real time, but it would change the face of modern music.

Imagine being able to play an old beat up guitar, mandolin, trumpet, kazoo, clarinet, violin, or saxophone into an old beat up microphone, and after some calculations the software will convert it, and give you the most angelic perfectly recorded piece of music you ever laid down.

That’s the potential.

Every organic instrument could already be a MIDI controller.

MIDI is only going to get more powerful, and the number of life-like virtual instruments grows everyday.

Imagine, Apple puts this into GarageBand… one day a college kid practices the drums on a practice mat in his dorm room (you know, a bunch of different circles to hit that make slightly different sounds, but quieter than a drum kit, or maybe just set up coffee cans), his MacBook is recording nearby with its built in microphone, the kid hits a button and his practice session is converted into the most perfectly mic’ed drums ever. Drums have a reputation as the most difficult instrument to mic, it’s not for amateurs.

Apple could even brand and sell the drum practice mat; they love that kind of thing.

Or you find a virtual instrument pack that mimics yodeling. You yodel into a microphone, the computer will measure pitch and length and then give you perfect yodels to your specification. It won’t sound like you, but it would if you could yodel.

Well, that’s the future as I see it.

There might be some people uncomfortable with this; they might argue that all music would sound the same if everyone used the same set of virtual instruments for example, or they might be uncomfortable with how “un-genuine” the music is.

But after post-production things get changed so much even the same virtual instrument would not sound any more similar than one acoustic guitar compared with another. And anyone who is concerned with how fake music is getting, should realize that for a long time now, algorithms have existed to keep music in pitch and in tempo.

It’s possible that someone who could barely play his or her instrument or can’t really sing laid down a million dollar track. But I hoped they at least had style.

AFTERWARDS: THE ACOSTIC GUITARS AND THE COCKROACHES

Beating on an old acoustic guitar is a lot of fun, and it always will be. The guitar as a musical instrument is going to go in and out of fashion, but I will always be a guitar player. I bet there are plenty of people out there who feel the same way about their organic instrument, no matter what that instrument may be.

That being said, in the recording process, organic instruments don’t hold a candle to computer generated virtual instruments. If tone-to-MIDI software were improved, it could lead to generating music of the highest production value, from instruments of the lowest, and that is the Do-It-Yourself spirit. With one click of a mouse, you could finally have your million-dollar studio.

3-2-1 Watch for the flash.

-J Roland Kelly

  • Share/Bookmark

© 2007-2010 J ROLAND KELLY All Rights Reserved